Contractor vs Employee Cost: When Each Makes Financial Sense

~1 min read

The common framing — "contractors are expensive, employees are cheaper in the long run" — is often correct but requires careful math. Here's how to compare.

The Core Cost Equation

Employee total cost = salary × 1.25–1.40 (taxes + benefits)

Contractor cost = hourly rate × hours worked

At a $100 contractor rate for 2,080 hours (full time): $208,000/year

Equivalent employee at $120k salary, all-in: $156,000/year

In this case, the employee is clearly cheaper — but only if you need someone full time, year-round, with the same skill set.

When Contractors Are Cheaper

  1. Part-time need: < 20 hours/week (< 1,040 hours/year) — employee overhead is wasted on idle capacity.

  2. Short-term project: 3–6 months — you avoid recruiting costs, severance, and benefits setup for a limited engagement.

  3. Specialized skills: A $200/hr specialist for 40 hours ($8,000) is cheaper than hiring a specialist employee at $150k/year for one-time work.

  4. Speed: Contractors can start in days; employees take 30–90 days to source and onboard.

Hidden Costs of Employees vs Contractors

Factor Employee Contractor
Recruiting cost $5k–$30k Minimal
Onboarding time 2–6 months Days
Severance risk Yes No
Benefits overhead $15k–$25k/year None
Management overhead Higher Lower
IP assignment Clear Requires contract
Compliance risk Lower (W-2) Misclassification risk

The Breakeven Formula

At what rate does a contractor break even with an employee?

Breakeven contractor rate = (salary × 1.30) ÷ hours needed

For a $100k employee needed 1,040 hours/year: ($130k ÷ 1,040) = $125/hr

If the contractor charges more than $125/hr for 1,040 hours, the employee is cheaper at the margin. If they charge less, the contractor is cheaper.

Calculate your numbers at the Employee Cost Calculator.

Calculate it yourself — free

Use our free Employee Cost Calculator to run the numbers for your own business.

Open Employee Cost →